Skip to content


September 21, 2010

The Claims:

Creationism is a religious belief, usually associated with fundamentalist Christianity, which holds that the universe, life on Earth, and especially humanity, were created by a supernatural being. Biblical Creationists base their belief on the creation story in the book of Genesis, whereas so-called Creation Scientists claim to provide scientific evidence for their belief. Creationism is characterized by its rejection of scientific accounts of the origin of the universe, the formation and development of the Earth, and most particularly, the theory of evolution.

There are several different varieties of creationism, varying in the extent of their Biblical literalism. The most extreme is Young Earth Creationism, which holds that the Earth was created less than 10000 years ago, with living kinds – including man – much as they are today. Geological features are explained in terms of Noah’s flood. Old Earth Creationism allows that the universe is billions of years old, and that life developed gradually, but still rejects evolution, holding that the Creator must intervene regularly to create new forms of life. Intelligent Design Theory is the most recent variant of Old Earth Creationism (though its proponents deny this), allowing a significant role for evolution, while still insisting that supernatural intervention is required.

The Evidence:

The evidence against the Young Earth hypothesis is overwhelming, and comes from a wide variety of scientific disciplines. Old Earth Creationism, in all its forms, is chiefly a negative hypothesis stating that the theory of evolution (and science in general) cannot account for the origin and development of living forms. From the (alleged) failure of proposed naturalistic accounts of the origin of species, it is inferred that a supernatural being must be responsible. This argument is fallacious, since the failure of one naturalistic account in no way demonstrates that no naturalistic account is correct.

Moreover, the arguments against evolutionary theory are generally very weak. (There is a huge number of such arguments; for a thorough review and refutation of each one, see Talk-Origins.)

Most creationist arguments against evolution amount to claims that there is not enough evidence for the theory, or that expected evidence is missing. For example, it is often claimed that the fossil record used to justify claims of gradual evolution is full of “gaps”. Creationists demand evidence of “transitional forms” – a species that is half-bird and half-dinosaur, for example. This argument ignores the discoveries of feathered dinosaurs, fish with limbs, and early hominids. Most of the supposed gaps have been filled in with an array of transitional species. More importantly, since fossilization is such a rare phenomenon, the failure to find such fossils would not have constituted evidence against evolution.


Creationism is a religious dogma masquerading as a scientific theory. Its claims largely consist of criticisms of evolutionary theory. Even there, the criticisms are weak, for they mostly involve simply pointing out gaps in the evolutionary evidence, or currently unexplained phenomena. It is a big step from the claim that a piece of evidence or explanation is currently lacking, to the creationists’ claim that it will always be lacking. Given the rate at which scientists have been filling in the evolutionary jigsaw, it is highly likely that the creationists’ gaps will continue to shrink. Meanwhile, outside of scriptural literalism, there is not a jot of positive evidence for the creationist hypothesis.


The Talk-Origins Archive

5 Comments leave one →
  1. Rational permalink
    July 10, 2015 7:57 PM is full of deception, bluster and lies. Written by scientists? Unfortunately, if you look into their credentials, even the founders, not one holds a biological, genetic, archaeology or any other credible degree. Its quite easy to discern the BS, especially when they have a JEWS not apply to their ministry policy. Trish, please go get some of your questions answered by credible scientists… not outcasts and ones that obtained degrees from creation universities.

  2. Jonny permalink
    April 25, 2011 2:19 PM

    We’d be exploring the outer limits of the galaxy by now if it weren’t for an army of people who think like “Trish”. Whenever science knocks down ridiculous bronze age superstitious beliefs, it always pays a price. The price is that society and progress as a whole are put on hold while we drag the indoctrinated and ignorant kicking and screaming out of the dark ages. I can’t believe this is still such a problem in the 21st century.

    The answer Trish would probably give? “It’s really complicated, so god musta done it.”


  3. Trish permalink
    February 13, 2011 6:14 PM

    Hi. Just thought I’d point out the Creation Ministries website at which has many interesting articles, most written by scientists.
    I just listened to a talk on there by Calvin Smith on the complexity of the cell.
    Worth having a look and listen!


  1. Intelligent Design « Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Evidence
  2. Young Earth « Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Evidence

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: